We are not interested in presenting case studies of our past successes, as anyone can give these examples. In fact, the truth about investment management is that there are many mistakes. Baseball is a perfect metaphor for this. In baseball, a highly impressive batting average is 0.400, but that still means the batter missed the ball 6 out of 10 times. We admit we have made many mistakes in the past, but we can honestly claim that we have learned valuable lessons from all our mistakes. This is how our investment approach is built.
A key concept of our investment philosophy is to recognize CHANGE as a source of return. We are certain that the only constant in financial markets is CHANGE. Any investment strategy will be wrong from time to time, just as different sectors will go from boom to bust and back again. No company remains the same in terms of its fundamentals. The ‘FOUR SEASONS’ in our name represents our acknowledgement of the constantly changing environment that we work in. Those are the CHANGES we try to capture as a source of return.
“At the peak of summer, keep in mind that winter always follows. In the middle of a severe winter, never forget that spring comes next.”
We define risk as losing clients’ money.
No one can challenge the fundamental principle of risk and return. Without risk, there is no return.
One problem is that nature of human being blocks sound risk taking activities (therefore, return becomes mediocre). Emotional factors driven by fear or greed, jeopardizes risk taking activities.
Risk must be taken in smart way and must be controlled. However, in a lot of cases, risks are handled by human beings who are dominated by emotion. It would be emotionally comfortable if you follow the herd with others or if you linearly extrapolate current assumption.
This is the 1st step to avoid risk (and less return). Investment managers can be comfortable, but their clients will be uncomfortable on their return.
Our job therefore is to take calculated risks in the financial market on behalf of our clients under the defined risk budget.
There are two major sources of risk (=losing money) related to stock investment. One is valuation. The other is business fundamentals. Risk related to valuation is mitigated by playing in a less crowded field. Risk related to business fundamental is where our bottom-up research efforts plays out. During the research process we look at the fundamental logic rather than the stock price actions. People may be less fearful when they follow crowds. But, herding and risk taking is totally different. Emotion and price action dominates herding but calculated risk taking is dominated by logic. After all, “treasure can be found among themes that other people throw away” (quote from Nobel Prize winner Dr. S.Yamanaka, cell system research). Good investment case is always searched by animal spirits and is refined by intelligence, NOT coming from emotional comfortable-ness.
For us, investment is risk taking seeking for attractive risk/return profile (return potential > downside potential) with CHANGE as catalyst.
Investment decision driven by emotion such as fear and greed (not based on logic, risk/return principle).
Our framework is to enhance probability of generating target return in sustainable manner by reducing emotional factors from the process as much as possible.
Understand the nature of risk we take;
Define our own value range for stocks and prepare for appropriate entry timing;
Develop view on the changing world.
Cluster of satisfactory risk takings = Set of long positions of call options;
Diversified investment horizon but concentrate on what we can understand.
1-2yr horizon: CEO who can show macro “insensitive” earnings growth;
Long-term horizon: CEO who can prepare higher growth at macro weakness with vision and philosophy through continuous efforts to evolve.
Have unbiased eyes and expose ourselves to anything with desire to understand the real logic of the world;
Be cautious in taking position on the side of the majority.
Our investment focus is “CHANGE”, not sector, benchmark, style. As far as CHANGE is available in the world, we do not run out of source of opportunities. If such CHANGEs were available at discount (neglected), those could be in our strike zone.